Gamers may also need to take note that neither "BioShock 2" or "BioShock: Infinite" are getting any new content. With some noticing the absence of improved FOV (Field of View), modern Anti-Aliasing and anisotropic methods, the game still felt pale compared to the games being released today, including a select indie titles. The first "BioShock" game, as shown on the trailer, appears to have big changes in lighting and overall resolution and textures, but for the other two games, seeing the differences may take a bit more effort and would actually be subjective to different eyes. However, for those who are looking to find an entirely different game in aesthetic sense, "BioShock: The Collection" may fall a bit short. On its own, "BioShock: The Collection" is already an epic game collection in its own merit, remastered or not. Be sure to watch the video below in the highest possible resolution to see the differences. In a video below, a brief comparison is shown on how the first game stood the test of time and surprisingly enough, it did. For hardcore fans, getting the bundle is a no-brainer, but for some, especially newcomers, is "BioShock: The Collection" worth looking at? Every "BioShock" game is a unique masterpiece that stands quite highly among the hundreds of first person shooters.įor those wondering, "BioShock: The Collection" is a complete bundle of all three games, somewhat remastered and includes all DLC content ever released. Popular gaming sites like IGN gave "BioShock" a very high rating of 9.7 out 10 along with the second being 9.1, and "Infinite" being 9.5.
#BIOSHOCK 2 REMASTERED CHANGES SERIES#
The next two games in the series did the same but will getting them in a bundle in the form of "BioShock:The Collection" be worth it?
The original "BioShock" game was widely received by gamers back in 2007 as it provided epic fps experience and equally engaging and interesting story.
0 kommentar(er)
